The Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers - it began with words
January 26, 2009
By Irwin Cotler
The Jerusalem Post
On this United Nations
International Holocaust Remembrance Day, words may ease the pain, but
they may also dwarf the tragedy. For
the Holocaust is uniquely evil in its genocidal singularity,
where biology was inescapably destiny, a war against the Jews in which,
as Nobel Peace Laureate
Elie Wiesel put it, "not all victims were Jews, but all Jews were
victims."
This year, in the immediate aftermath of the 60th anniversary of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
the international Magna Carta of human rights born out of the
ashes of
the Holocaust, and
the Genocide
Convention - the "Never Again"
Convention which has
tragically been violated again and again - we should ask ourselves: What
have we learned, and what must we do?
Lesson 1 - THE IMPORTANCE OF HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE
The first lesson is the importance of remembrance itself. For as we
remember the six million Jewish victims of
the Holocaust - first
defamed, demonized and dehumanized, as prologue or justification for
genocide, then murdered - we have to understand that the mass murder of
millions is not a matter of abstract statistics. For unto each person
there is a name - unto each person there is an identity. Each person is
a universe. As both the Talmud and Koran teach us, whoever saves a
single life, it is as if he or she has saved an entire universe - just
as whoever has killed a single person, it is as if they have destroyed
an entire universe. And so the abiding imperative: that we are each,
wherever we are, the guarantors of each other's destiny.
Lesson 2 - THE DANGER OF STATE-SANCTIONED INCITEMENT TO
HATRED AND GENOCIDE: THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PREVENT IT
The enduring lesson of
the Holocaust and the
genocides that followed is that they occurred not simply because of the
machinery of death, but because of a state-sanctioned ideology of hate.
This teaching of contempt, this demonizing of the other - this is where
it all begins. As the Canadian Supreme Court recognized, in words echoed
by the
international criminal tribunals in the former Yugoslavia and
Rwanda, the
Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers - it began with
words. These, as the courts put it, are the chilling facts of history.
These are the catastrophic effects of racism.
Sixty years later, these lessons not only remained unlearned, but the
tragedies have been repeated. For we were all bystanders during a
growing state-sponsored hate in the Balkans, Rwanda and Darfur that took
us down the road to genocide.
At present, we are witnessing yet another state-sanctioned incitement
to hate and genocide, whose epicentre is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran -
denying the Nazi Holocaust as it incites to a Middle Eastern one.
This constitutes a direct violation of the overriding prohibition in
international law against the direct and public incitement to genocide,
and a clear legal trigger for
the international community
to intervene in fulfilment of its obligation to prevent genocide, as
established in the Genocide
Convention.
As one involved as Minister of Justice in Canada in the prosecution
of Rwandan incitement, I can state that the aggregate of precursors of
incitement in the Iranian case are more threatening than were those in
the Rwandan one.
Lesson 3 - THE DANGERS OF SILENCE, THE CONSEQUENCES OF
INDIFFERENCE: THE DUTY TO PROTECT
Indeed, the genocide of European Jewry succeeded not only because of
a culture of hate and an industry of death, but because of crimes of
indifference and conspiracies of silence. And we have witnessed an
appalling indifference and inaction in our own day which took us down
the road to the unthinkable - ethnic cleansing in the Balkans - and down
the road to the unspeakable - the preventable genocides in Rwanda and
Darfur. No one can say that we did not know. We knew, but we did not act
in Rwanda, just as we know and do not act in Darfur, ignoring thereby
the lessons of history, betraying the people of Darfur, and mocking the
Responsibility to Protect doctrine.
And so, it is our responsibility to break down these walls of
indifference, to shatter these conspiracies of silence - to stand up and
be counted and not look around to see who else is standing before we
make a decision to do so; because in the world in which we live, there
are few enough people prepared to stand, let alone be counted.
Indifference always means coming down on the side of the victimizer,
never on the side of the victim.
Let there be no mistake about it: indifference in the face of evil is
acquiescence with evil itself - it is complicity with evil.
Lesson 4 - COMBATING MASS ATROCITY AND THE CULTURE OF
IMPUNITY: THE RESPONSIBILITY TO BRING WAR CRIMINALS TO JUSTICE
If the last century - symbolized by
the Holocaust - was the age
of atrocity, it was also the age of impunity. Few of the perpetrators
were brought to justice; and so, just as there must be no sanctuary for
hate, no refuge for bigotry, there must be no base or sanctuary for
these enemies of humankind. In this context, the establishment of
the
International Criminal Court must be seen as the most dramatic
development in international criminal law since Nuremberg. But it
requires active support to prevent it from being another opportunity for
impunity.
One need look no further than the case of Ahmed Haroun, the Sudanese
Minister of the Interior indicted for his direct role in the war crimes
and crimes against humanity perpetrated in Darfur, who was then
cynically rewarded for this indictment by being appointed Minister of
State for Humanitarian Affairs and made responsible for hearing the
human rights complaints from the very victims he had assaulted.
Lesson 5 - THE TRAHISON DES CLERCS
Nazism succeeded, not only because of the "bureaucratization of
genocide," as Robert Lifton put it, but because of the trahison des
clercs - the complicity of the elites: physicians, church leaders,
judges, lawyers, engineers, architects, educators and the like. As
Elie Wiesel
put it: "Cold-blooded murder and culture did not exclude each other. If
the
Holocaust proved anything, it is that a person can both love
poems and kill children."
Those of us to who have been entrusted with the
education and training of the elites should ensure that Elie
Wiesel is studied in schools of law and not just in classes of
literature; and that the double entendre of Nuremberg - of Nuremberg
racism as well as the Nuremberg Principles - is as much a part of our
learning as it is a part of our legacy.
CONCLUSION
We should reaffirm today that never again will we be indifferent to
racism and hate; that never again will we be silent in the face of evil;
that never again will we ignore the plight of the vulnerable; that never
again will we acquiesce in the face of mass atrocity and impunity. We
will speak and we will act against racism, against hate, against
anti-Semitism, against mass atrocity, against injustice - and against
the crime whose name we should shudder even to mention: genocide.
May this day be not only an act of remembrance, which it is, but a
reminder to act, which it must be.
The writer is the former Canadian minister of justice and attorney
general and is a law professor (on leave) from McGill University. He has
written extensively on
international human rights law and genocide prevention.