Sunday, April 05, 2009
Georgia climbs crime rankings: A national survey ranks Georgia the 12th most dangerous state. But are the numbers trustworthy?
By Mark Woolsey
Feb. 13, 2007: An elderly Habersham County woman is robbed
and brutally beaten by two men demanding that she pay them
for roof work. Nov. 1, 2007: A woman's body is found in her
burned-out home on Fayetteville Road in Jonesboro; a
42-year-old man is later arrested for what is determined to
be a homicide. June 1, 2007: A man is arrested for the
murder of a woman, her daughter, and her 2- and 4-year-old
grandchildren, all found in their burning home in Hoschton.
Just a few bits of the mosaic that made up major crime in
Georgia, circa 2007. Now a research outfit crunching the FBI
crime stats that resulted from those reports paints a
disturbing picture. An annual analysis report titled "Crime
State Rankings 2009" released March 23 by CQ Press (formerly
Morgan Quitno) ranks Georgia the 12th most dangerous state
in the nation based on incidents in 2007, the latest year
for which full numbers are available. The ranking moves
Georgia up seven slots from the year before, when our state
was a less worrisome No. 19. In three categories - murder,
robbery and motor vehicle theft - Georgia ranked in the top
10.
But academics and police experts complain that CQ Press' raw
numbers aren't controlled for socio-economic factors.
"I would be polite," says Robert Friedmann, criminal justice
professor at Georgia State, "and just comment that the
methodology of that data is severely flawed. I think what
they are doing is using zip codes."
Friedmann is principal author of a homicide study of 63
medium and large U.S. cities - not states - released last
week that shows Atlanta's unadjusted crime ranking at 8th
highest. Once adjusted for the city's socioeconomic
weaknesses, however, Atlanta comes out at 43rd among the
cities Friedmann examined. The socioeconomic metric takes
into account household income, poverty and percentage of
single-parent families. Once one considers all that, says
Freidmann, Atlanta - despite its problems - actually
performs better than expected.
To be fair, even the authors of the CQ Press rankings say
their newly released numbers don't tell the full story.
"The numbers in the book are a starting point, a reference
point for further research," says Ben Krasney, spokesman for
Scott and Kathleen O'Leary Morgan, the researchers who put
together the CQ Press rankings.
Krasney says the stats come from the FBI's Uniform Crime
Report (UCR) which is compiled from police reports submitted
by local jurisdictions. The raw numbers in six categories -
murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary and
motor vehicle theft - are indexed to create a summary score,
then calculated according to frequency, rate and percent
change of reported crime.
Seems straightforward enough. But as Krasney carefully puts
it: "I have heard in a number of calls from various places
that there are potential differences in the way crimes are
reported in different areas. My understanding is the UCR is
supposed to have rules governing how things are reported. If
some areas are not following the rules and changing things
slightly, we admit there could be some flaws in the data."
AN INCOMPLETE PICTURE
Frank V. Rotondo, executive director of the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police, says numbers alone paint an incomplete picture."Everybody will interpret the data in the way they want to," he says. "If they're not happy, they might say cops are writing too many traffic tickets and not arresting enough people. People who support law enforcement might say differently."
Rotondo says any examination of raw data on crimes in Georgia has to take into account the state's growth. According to the Census Bureau, Georgia has grown at twice the national average since 2000. It's the ninth-fastest growing state in the nation. And, Rotondo says, cops here make a lot of arrests in the face of the rising crime that comes with a booming population.
The Pew Center on the States reported in March that one in 13 people in Georgia are under some sort of justice system supervision, including parole and probation, compared to one in 31 nationally, putting Georgia at the top of the list for residents who've run afoul of the law. (Even the Pew Center acknowledges that its numbers vary according to the way states count their own supervised populations - which isn't a matter of uniform methodology.)
"With growth comes problems," says Rotondo, "and crime is one of those problems."
Elaine Weeks, director of criminal justice studies at the University of Georgia, agrees, and adds two factors: a more mobile population and a lot of single-parent households.
Another variable isn't an official factor: the ability of law enforcement to collect crime data. Weeks doesn't think local jurisdictions outright fudge crime statistics very often, "partly because of the publicizing of these incidents." But, she says, if a local department is understaffed, the numbers might not be gathered and reported efficiently.
That only exacerbates the well-known under-reporting of such crime categories as rape. It also piles more unreported crimes onto those that already go unreported by some among Georgia's immigrant population, who fear that police will arrest them for being in the country illegally.
Weeks cautions that any analysis has to take into account longer-term trends, not just a single-year snapshot. She says her look at violent crime rates, for example, shows a drop in Georgia between 2001-2005, followed by an uptick in 2006 and 2007.
And yes, she asserts, the economy may get some blame, but the 2007 figures were collected before the job market went into freefall.
CQ Press' Krasney views his firm's results - Georgia's 12th-place ranking - as a starting point for further research, community debate and action aimed at addressing crime and public safety issues. Rotondo agrees, and adds that it's a call for law enforcement to be adequately trained and staffed despite hard economic times.
"You have to invest in the system you put into place," he says, including not only police forces but corrections facilities and programs as well as indigent defense funding. Rotondo criticizes cuts in diversion programs, where people spend time in jail and then receive treatment for substance abuse problems. Without adequate correctional programs, he says, people continue cycling through the system.
"If you let people commit three, four, five burglaries, for example, before you put them in jail," he says, "the law is nullified." SP
